<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Ajmer Dhariwal's SQL Server blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.eraofdata.com/blog/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.eraofdata.com/blog</link>
	<description>SQL Server posts that DBAs will (hopefully) find useful.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 05:09:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Misaligned disk partition offsets and SQL Server Performance by SQL Server and Disk IO &#124; Ajmer Dhariwal's SQL Server blog</title>
		<link>http://www.eraofdata.com/blog/2010/02/misaligned-disk-partition-offsets-and-sql-server-performance/#comment-2451</link>
		<dc:creator>SQL Server and Disk IO &#124; Ajmer Dhariwal's SQL Server blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 20:09:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eraofdata.com/blog/?p=221#comment-2451</guid>
		<description>[...] of Data       home &#124;&#124; about &#124;&#124; contact &#124;&#124; blog &#124;&#124;             &#171; The SQL Server default trace Misaligned disk partition offsets and SQL Server Performance [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of Data       home || about || contact || blog ||             &laquo; The SQL Server default trace Misaligned disk partition offsets and SQL Server Performance [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SQL Server memory configuration by Ajmer Dhariwal</title>
		<link>http://www.eraofdata.com/blog/2008/10/sql-server-memory-configuration/#comment-2450</link>
		<dc:creator>Ajmer Dhariwal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 09:03:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eraofdata.com/blog/?p=3#comment-2450</guid>
		<description>Hi Jignesh,

As indicatd in the blog, if no memory limits are set then SQL Server can eventually use up as much memory as it possibly can, if the workload is there. On a 32-bit system (without awe enabled) this will be @ 1.6 GB.
There can be many reasons for the sluggish behaviour - how much RAM is there in total on the machine? If SQL Server is using most of what is available this may be a factor.
Otherwise narrow down what is causing the issue using http://technet.microsoft.com/en-gb/library/cc966540.aspx

Regards,
Ajmer</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jignesh,</p>
<p>As indicatd in the blog, if no memory limits are set then SQL Server can eventually use up as much memory as it possibly can, if the workload is there. On a 32-bit system (without awe enabled) this will be @ 1.6 GB.<br />
There can be many reasons for the sluggish behaviour - how much RAM is there in total on the machine? If SQL Server is using most of what is available this may be a factor.<br />
Otherwise narrow down what is causing the issue using <a href="http://technet.microsoft.com/en-gb/library/cc966540.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://technet.microsoft.com/en-gb/library/cc966540.aspx</a></p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Ajmer</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SQL Server memory configuration by Jignesh</title>
		<link>http://www.eraofdata.com/blog/2008/10/sql-server-memory-configuration/#comment-2449</link>
		<dc:creator>Jignesh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 08:12:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eraofdata.com/blog/?p=3#comment-2449</guid>
		<description>Hi 
Thanks for the blog,

i wanted to know is there any way that SQL server process release unused memory 
my problem is we have a single instance server containing a signle database to which atleast 10 users are conneted at a time

now this SQL server process start consuming memory upto 1.5GB in no time and it resonses slow back to the client machines

can you have any sugesion on this</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi<br />
Thanks for the blog,</p>
<p>i wanted to know is there any way that SQL server process release unused memory<br />
my problem is we have a single instance server containing a signle database to which atleast 10 users are conneted at a time</p>
<p>now this SQL server process start consuming memory upto 1.5GB in no time and it resonses slow back to the client machines</p>
<p>can you have any sugesion on this</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Orphaned MSDTC transactions (-2 spids) by Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.eraofdata.com/blog/2008/12/orphaned-msdtc-transactions-2-spids/#comment-2448</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 05:51:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eraofdata.com/blog/?p=99#comment-2448</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your suggestion. The GUI MSDTC actually matched what the queries showed i.e. killing the SPID also removed it from the GUI. Restarting the MSDTC didn't work but restarting the SQL Server Service ended up fixing the issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your suggestion. The GUI MSDTC actually matched what the queries showed i.e. killing the SPID also removed it from the GUI. Restarting the MSDTC didn&#8217;t work but restarting the SQL Server Service ended up fixing the issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Orphaned MSDTC transactions (-2 spids) by Ajmer Dhariwal</title>
		<link>http://www.eraofdata.com/blog/2008/12/orphaned-msdtc-transactions-2-spids/#comment-2447</link>
		<dc:creator>Ajmer Dhariwal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 21:58:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eraofdata.com/blog/?p=99#comment-2447</guid>
		<description>The transaction should still be visible in the MSDTC  GUI. If so, it will probably be marked as in-doubt. so right click on it and choose to Abort or Forget it.
Otherwise try restarting MSDTC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The transaction should still be visible in the MSDTC  GUI. If so, it will probably be marked as in-doubt. so right click on it and choose to Abort or Forget it.<br />
Otherwise try restarting MSDTC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Orphaned MSDTC transactions (-2 spids) by Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.eraofdata.com/blog/2008/12/orphaned-msdtc-transactions-2-spids/#comment-2446</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 08:38:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eraofdata.com/blog/?p=99#comment-2446</guid>
		<description>Hi,

Thanks for the informative article. I wonder if you can help. I seem to be having problems with an orphan transaction blocking a resource. I've posted the problem here: http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic834337-364-1.aspx

Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>Thanks for the informative article. I wonder if you can help. I seem to be having problems with an orphan transaction blocking a resource. I&#8217;ve posted the problem here: <a href="http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic834337-364-1.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic834337-364-1.aspx</a></p>
<p>Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SQL Server memory configuration by levidos</title>
		<link>http://www.eraofdata.com/blog/2008/10/sql-server-memory-configuration/#comment-2445</link>
		<dc:creator>levidos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 12:04:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eraofdata.com/blog/?p=3#comment-2445</guid>
		<description>Great post, thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post, thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The SQL Server default trace by califguy4christ</title>
		<link>http://www.eraofdata.com/blog/2009/09/the-sql-server-default-trace/#comment-2442</link>
		<dc:creator>califguy4christ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 20:34:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eraofdata.com/blog/?p=161#comment-2442</guid>
		<description>Great post!  Thanks for enumerating a few scenarios, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post!  Thanks for enumerating a few scenarios, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Orphaned MSDTC transactions (-2 spids) by SQL Server Central</title>
		<link>http://www.eraofdata.com/blog/2008/12/orphaned-msdtc-transactions-2-spids/#comment-2305</link>
		<dc:creator>SQL Server Central</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 13:52:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eraofdata.com/blog/?p=99#comment-2305</guid>
		<description>[...] I have experienced –2 session_ids and I understand how to fix this problem.&#160; Click here for more information on –2 session_ids.&#160; I had never experienced a –4.&#160; After a few [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I have experienced –2 session_ids and I understand how to fix this problem.&nbsp; Click here for more information on –2 session_ids.&nbsp; I had never experienced a –4.&nbsp; After a few [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The SQL Server default trace by Troubleshooting SQL Server login failures (18456 errors) &#124; Ajmer Dhariwal's SQL Server blog</title>
		<link>http://www.eraofdata.com/blog/2009/09/the-sql-server-default-trace/#comment-2287</link>
		<dc:creator>Troubleshooting SQL Server login failures (18456 errors) &#124; Ajmer Dhariwal's SQL Server blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 23:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eraofdata.com/blog/?p=161#comment-2287</guid>
		<description>[...] in an out-of-the-box installation) then you don&#8217;t need to start a new trace; check out my SQL Server default trace post [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in an out-of-the-box installation) then you don&#8217;t need to start a new trace; check out my SQL Server default trace post [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
