<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SQL Server memory configuration</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.eraofdata.com/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=3" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.eraofdata.com/blog/2008/10/sql-server-memory-configuration/</link>
	<description>SQL Server posts that DBAs will (hopefully) find useful.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 02:08:24 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ajmer Dhariwal</title>
		<link>http://www.eraofdata.com/blog/2008/10/sql-server-memory-configuration/#comment-2463</link>
		<dc:creator>Ajmer Dhariwal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 18:43:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eraofdata.com/blog/?p=3#comment-2463</guid>
		<description>Please send me the dbcc memorystatus output from the configuration that results in long running queries.
Also, are these ad-hoc/dynamic queries or stored procs?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please send me the dbcc memorystatus output from the configuration that results in long running queries.<br />
Also, are these ad-hoc/dynamic queries or stored procs?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tonga</title>
		<link>http://www.eraofdata.com/blog/2008/10/sql-server-memory-configuration/#comment-2461</link>
		<dc:creator>Tonga</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 18:31:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eraofdata.com/blog/?p=3#comment-2461</guid>
		<description>Very insteresting article. 
I have a very interesting scenary. Running W2003(4GB memory)/SQL 2005 
When I set max memory to maximun, Im getting long times queries; but If I set max memory to round 200 MB then they take 2 seconds. Any suggestion?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very insteresting article.<br />
I have a very interesting scenary. Running W2003(4GB memory)/SQL 2005<br />
When I set max memory to maximun, Im getting long times queries; but If I set max memory to round 200 MB then they take 2 seconds. Any suggestion?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ajmer Dhariwal</title>
		<link>http://www.eraofdata.com/blog/2008/10/sql-server-memory-configuration/#comment-2459</link>
		<dc:creator>Ajmer Dhariwal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 22:03:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eraofdata.com/blog/?p=3#comment-2459</guid>
		<description>That looks about right to me. Monitoring the buffer cache size via the perfmon counters should validate those settings by showing memory usage eventually growing to 6GB and staying at that limit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That looks about right to me. Monitoring the buffer cache size via the perfmon counters should validate those settings by showing memory usage eventually growing to 6GB and staying at that limit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T_Brothers</title>
		<link>http://www.eraofdata.com/blog/2008/10/sql-server-memory-configuration/#comment-2458</link>
		<dc:creator>T_Brothers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 20:57:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eraofdata.com/blog/?p=3#comment-2458</guid>
		<description>Great post! Thanks!

We have a Windows 2003 Ent server 64-bit with 8GB RAM.
We are running SQL 2005 Ent 32-bit.

We do not have /PAE or /3GB in the boot.ini and I will not add either of them.
I will enable AWE wirthin SQL and set max memory to 6GB.
I will enable "locked pages in memory" in gpedit.msc
Then I will reboot the server and hope for the best.

Does that sound correct?

Thanks,
T_Brothers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post! Thanks!</p>
<p>We have a Windows 2003 Ent server 64-bit with 8GB RAM.<br />
We are running SQL 2005 Ent 32-bit.</p>
<p>We do not have /PAE or /3GB in the boot.ini and I will not add either of them.<br />
I will enable AWE wirthin SQL and set max memory to 6GB.<br />
I will enable &#8220;locked pages in memory&#8221; in gpedit.msc<br />
Then I will reboot the server and hope for the best.</p>
<p>Does that sound correct?</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
T_Brothers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T Jacobs</title>
		<link>http://www.eraofdata.com/blog/2008/10/sql-server-memory-configuration/#comment-2456</link>
		<dc:creator>T Jacobs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 10:39:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eraofdata.com/blog/?p=3#comment-2456</guid>
		<description>Thanks.  That was a big help</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks.  That was a big help</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ajmer Dhariwal</title>
		<link>http://www.eraofdata.com/blog/2008/10/sql-server-memory-configuration/#comment-2455</link>
		<dc:creator>Ajmer Dhariwal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 19:24:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eraofdata.com/blog/?p=3#comment-2455</guid>
		<description>Thanks. You shouldn't have to enable PAE, but if it's 32-bit SQL you'll need to enable awe and because of that set a cap on memory usage, as it will use all the memory that edition can access.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks. You shouldn&#8217;t have to enable PAE, but if it&#8217;s 32-bit SQL you&#8217;ll need to enable awe and because of that set a cap on memory usage, as it will use all the memory that edition can access.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T Jacobs</title>
		<link>http://www.eraofdata.com/blog/2008/10/sql-server-memory-configuration/#comment-2454</link>
		<dc:creator>T Jacobs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 17:37:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eraofdata.com/blog/?p=3#comment-2454</guid>
		<description>Hi Ajmer,

This is a great post.  I just to to resolve one final lingering in our mind.  We are porting(until our sql 2008 is ready) our 32 bit SQL 2000 SP3 server (production version) to
a 64 bit machine with 64 gig of ram with databases on a SAN.  Based on the that there should be no PAE in the boot.ini. Correct?
AWE should be disable.  Correct?
No max memory set.  Correct?
SQL 2000 with use all available ram.  Correct?

Thanks in Advance</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ajmer,</p>
<p>This is a great post.  I just to to resolve one final lingering in our mind.  We are porting(until our sql 2008 is ready) our 32 bit SQL 2000 SP3 server (production version) to<br />
a 64 bit machine with 64 gig of ram with databases on a SAN.  Based on the that there should be no PAE in the boot.ini. Correct?<br />
AWE should be disable.  Correct?<br />
No max memory set.  Correct?<br />
SQL 2000 with use all available ram.  Correct?</p>
<p>Thanks in Advance</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ajmer Dhariwal</title>
		<link>http://www.eraofdata.com/blog/2008/10/sql-server-memory-configuration/#comment-2450</link>
		<dc:creator>Ajmer Dhariwal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 09:03:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eraofdata.com/blog/?p=3#comment-2450</guid>
		<description>Hi Jignesh,

As indicatd in the blog, if no memory limits are set then SQL Server can eventually use up as much memory as it possibly can, if the workload is there. On a 32-bit system (without awe enabled) this will be @ 1.6 GB.
There can be many reasons for the sluggish behaviour - how much RAM is there in total on the machine? If SQL Server is using most of what is available this may be a factor.
Otherwise narrow down what is causing the issue using http://technet.microsoft.com/en-gb/library/cc966540.aspx

Regards,
Ajmer</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jignesh,</p>
<p>As indicatd in the blog, if no memory limits are set then SQL Server can eventually use up as much memory as it possibly can, if the workload is there. On a 32-bit system (without awe enabled) this will be @ 1.6 GB.<br />
There can be many reasons for the sluggish behaviour - how much RAM is there in total on the machine? If SQL Server is using most of what is available this may be a factor.<br />
Otherwise narrow down what is causing the issue using <a href="http://technet.microsoft.com/en-gb/library/cc966540.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://technet.microsoft.com/en-gb/library/cc966540.aspx</a></p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Ajmer</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jignesh</title>
		<link>http://www.eraofdata.com/blog/2008/10/sql-server-memory-configuration/#comment-2449</link>
		<dc:creator>Jignesh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 08:12:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eraofdata.com/blog/?p=3#comment-2449</guid>
		<description>Hi 
Thanks for the blog,

i wanted to know is there any way that SQL server process release unused memory 
my problem is we have a single instance server containing a signle database to which atleast 10 users are conneted at a time

now this SQL server process start consuming memory upto 1.5GB in no time and it resonses slow back to the client machines

can you have any sugesion on this</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi<br />
Thanks for the blog,</p>
<p>i wanted to know is there any way that SQL server process release unused memory<br />
my problem is we have a single instance server containing a signle database to which atleast 10 users are conneted at a time</p>
<p>now this SQL server process start consuming memory upto 1.5GB in no time and it resonses slow back to the client machines</p>
<p>can you have any sugesion on this</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: levidos</title>
		<link>http://www.eraofdata.com/blog/2008/10/sql-server-memory-configuration/#comment-2445</link>
		<dc:creator>levidos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 12:04:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eraofdata.com/blog/?p=3#comment-2445</guid>
		<description>Great post, thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post, thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
